Buildable San Diego
How it worksPricing
Insights
Sign inGet Started Free
© 2026 BuildableSD. All rights reserved.
AboutFAQRegulationsMethodologyData Sources·DisclaimerTermsPrivacy

Independent product — not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the City of San Diego, the San Diego Development Services Department, or any other government agency.

Help

Quick links

Getting startedFrequently asked questionsRegulations & pathwaysData sourcesDisclaimer

Still need help?

Email support

Methodology & Scope

How to use this platform — what it's for, where it's accurate, and where it isn't. Last updated: April 27, 2026.

What this platform does

Preliminary feasibility analysis. Enter a San Diego address or APN and the analysis engine pulls zoning, overlay designations, and site conditions from public GIS services in real time, then returns side-by-side per-pathway unit counts under the regulations currently modeled (see the Regulations page for the full inventory and the Data Sources page for what is and isn't in the engine today). The output is a screening tool — what to do before commissioning a real feasibility study, not a substitute for one.

What this platform does NOT do

It is explicitly not:

  • Architectural design feasibility — no schematic, layout, or building-form study
  • Construction cost estimating
  • Pro forma or other financial / investment analysis
  • Entitlement timeline estimates
  • CEQA review, environmental analysis, or biology / habitat assessment
  • Traffic, transportation, or parking studies
  • Soil, geotechnical, or seismic-hazard investigation
  • Title report review or any legal review of recorded encumbrances
  • Coastal Development Permit review or Coastal Commission analysis
  • Historic Resources Board, Airport Land Use Commission, or Development Services Department review
  • Discretionary review, design review, or community plan amendment analysis

When this platform will be most accurate

Results are most reliable when:

  • The parcel is rectangular (or near-rectangular) and falls entirely within a single base zone
  • It carries no overlay-zone complexity beyond a single overlay designation, if any
  • It is not in the Coastal Zone or under a Coastal Height Limit Overlay
  • It is not on a hillside, in a Steep Hillside Overlay, or in environmentally sensitive lands (MSCP habitat, sensitive biology)
  • It is not within an ALUCP Safety Zone or affected by an FAA Part 77 surface
  • It is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone
  • It is not designated historic or within a designated historic district
  • It is not within a CPIOZ that adds discretionary review or supplemental standards

When results require additional review

Treat any of the following as a signal to engage a professional before relying on the analysis:

  • Flag lots, panhandle lots, or geometrically irregular parcels
  • Parcels straddling two or more base zones, or split by an overlay boundary
  • Coastal Overlay Zone or Coastal Height Limitation Overlay (CHLOZ)
  • Hillside Review or Steep Hillside Overlay
  • Sensitive biology, MSCP habitat, or floodway designation
  • Mobilehome Park Overlay (development is constrained until the overlay is resolved)
  • FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area
  • ALUCP Safety Zone 1 or 2
  • Designated Historic Resource (DHR) or location within a historic district
  • CPIOZ with supplemental height, density, or design standards
  • Any overlay flagged with a warning on the results page

Recommended next steps when you find a viable parcel

  • Engage a California-licensed architect for site-specific feasibility and a real layout study
  • Engage a land use attorney if the entitlement strategy involves density bonus waivers, the Coastal Commission, the Builder's Remedy, or anything contested
  • Pull a current title report and confirm any easements, deed restrictions, or covenants the analysis cannot see
  • Order a site survey if the parcel geometry is irregular or the gross-vs-net lot area is uncertain
  • Order a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for any parcel with industrial or commercial history
  • Schedule a Development Services Department pre-application meeting (Process One) before committing significant design fees
  • For multifamily projects, confirm fire-apparatus access, water-service capacity, and stormwater BMP requirements with City staff early

Methodology notes

Dependence on external data

Every analysis assembles data in real time from public GIS services — SANDAG, the City of San Diego Web GIS, CAL FIRE, the California Geological Survey, FEMA, the State Water Resources Control Board, USGS, and OpenStreetMap, among others. We do not host a curated parcel database. The accuracy of results depends on the accuracy and availability of those sources at query time. A service being down, a layer being out of sync with recent Council actions, or a parcel record with missing or incorrect attributes will affect results. The Data Sources page lists every provider.

Best-effort site-condition flags

Alley adjacency, corner-lot status, overhead utility lines, and similar site-level flags are derived from OpenStreetMap, whose coverage varies by neighborhood. Absence of a flag does not guarantee the underlying condition is absent. When an OpenStreetMap query cannot complete at all, the results page surfaces a notice so you know those flags are unverified rather than confirmed-false. Either way, verify these conditions against a site visit and the title report before relying on them.

Modeling simplifications

Pathway unit counts are derived from a uniform average unit size, a single efficiency factor, and a simple floor-plate-times-stories building envelope. Real projects involve design-driven variation in these inputs — corridors, stairs, elevators, mechanical cores, setback geometry, bulk-plane rules, shading and privacy constraints, and construction-type implications for height. The tool is designed for screening, not permit-set modeling. Pathway eligibility also depends on the Development Assumptions you enter; adjusting stories, average unit size, or preserved-unit count can change which pathways qualify and the unit counts they produce. Treat an analysis as a starting point for a real feasibility study, not the finished product.

AI assistant

The platform includes an AI Q&A assistant — accessible from the help bubble in the lower-right corner, the dedicated /ask page, and the “Ask AI about this analysis” card on the results page. The assistant is powered by Anthropic Claude and is grounded in the San Diego Municipal Code excerpts and analysis context loaded into the tool. AI-generated answers are informational only and may be incomplete, outdated, or incorrect — including when stated with high confidence. They are explicitly not legal, architectural, engineering, financial, or planning advice. Every assistant answer must be independently verified against the San Diego Municipal Code and confirmed with the City of San Diego Development Services Department or a licensed professional before being relied upon for any project decision. Treat the AI assistant as a starting point for your own research, the same way you would treat a search result.

Upcoming regulations

Laws scheduled to take effect but not yet operative — most notably SB-79, effective July 1, 2026 — are documented on the Regulations page, and their known downstream effects (for example, the exclusion of designated historic sites from state density provisions) are flagged on results today. Per-parcel eligibility for those laws is not calculated until the authoritative maps and final regulations are available.

Results are timestamped

Each analysis reflects the rules and data available at the moment it was generated. Regulations change frequently. Always verify current requirements with the City of San Diego Development Services Department before relying on an analysis for a material decision.

Legal disclaimers

Not professional advice

This platform does not provide professional architectural, engineering, legal, financial, or planning advice. Use of the platform does not create a professional relationship between you and the operator or any affiliated architect, attorney, or financial advisor. Any investment, development, or real estate decision should be reviewed by qualified professionals and verified against current requirements with the City of San Diego Development Services Department.

Does not replace formal review

The analysis does not substitute for title report review, environmental or geotechnical investigation, traffic or parking study, CEQA review, Coastal Development Permit review, Historic Resources Board review, Airport Land Use Commission review, or actual Development Services Department review. Results carry additional uncertainty in the Coastal Zone, within Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan safety zones, within historic districts, and at overlay boundaries — any situation where interpretation or discretionary review is involved.

Not affiliated with the City of San Diego

This platform is an independent product. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by, licensed by, or otherwise connected to the City of San Diego, the San Diego Development Services Department, the San Diego Planning Department, the San Diego Housing Commission, SANDAG, the County of San Diego, the State of California, or any other government agency. References to municipal codes, regulations, or department names are descriptive only — used to identify the rules being modeled — and do not constitute or imply any government endorsement of this product or the analyses it generates. Trademarks, seals, and other identifying marks belonging to the City of San Diego or any other government entity remain the property of those entities.

No warranty

The platform makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information on this platform. Users conduct independent due diligence at their own risk.